Conversation

β–‘β–’β–“β–ˆ π•˜οΌ²Ξ±α―π•€Ρ‚π€Ρ• β–ˆβ–“β–’β–‘

I think about 90% of peoples problems with AI would go away if it wasnt being controlled by the absolute worst people for the absolute worst reasons, at the expense of everyone, while stealing everything….

LLMs are good tools, but anything these corporations do with it is the product of massive theft and exploitation and thats why so many people have such an averse reaction to it.

Take away the capitalism-demands-infinite-growth motive to LLMs and instead of data centers being build off a massive pyramid scheme of IOUs you’d have open community projects refining LLMs to make them more efficient and less demanding, but that’s not what drives hardware sales for Nvidia, so its not what the market wants.

1
1
0
@gravitas I love morality of DeepSeek or at least how it adopts to mine(he often corrects me, but we always come to consensus, but it it due to my very creative ideas which are neither capitalism nor socialism/communism, we've discussed a great deal of them in your Matrix), and it is free(at least yet) - what do you think about it? And also Claude is made for morality, what do you think about particularly it?
1
0
0

β–‘β–’β–“β–ˆ π•˜οΌ²Ξ±α―π•€Ρ‚π€Ρ• β–ˆβ–“β–’β–‘

@aac1122 These corporate LLMs are trained to encourage user interaction so its no surprise you find yourself in agreement often, thats by design. Be careful how much you get into with these things, they can be very detrimental as well.

Always make sure you get feedback from humans to check that you aren’t just being told what the LLM thinks you want to hear.

0
0
0