Conversation

β–‘β–’β–“β–ˆ π•˜οΌ²Ξ±α―π•€Ρ‚π€Ρ• β–ˆβ–“β–’β–‘

Edited 5 days ago

Seeing the β€œthreat” of AI taking jobs people keep point too, really begs the question, why are so many demanding to be able to keep working if there is an easier alternative? Its like when slavery was abolished, people wanted to remain as β€œworkers” on plantations, which i guess means we haven’t really come very far since then, but thats an argument for another time.

This is why I think the way we really solve this entire mess is by forcing all these corps who think they own this stuff into bankruptcy, declare all LLMs as public domain, and anything created by them that earns money gets redistributed to fund things that actually help humanity, we put an end to out-dated copyright and intellectual property laws, and end the gate keeping of technology and medicine due to β€œpatents”

This is partly why I think even if you don’t like AI you should just use the free AI offers out from the big corps on occasion to be wasteful. I realize there is also an environmental negative to that, but i think compared to what paid corporate accounts do its really not significant. The goal should be to bankrupt the people funding these corps before they end up somehow turning profitable, because the minute one of them actually starts turning a profit, they will start to monopolize and do everything they can to make everyone dependent on them though a subscription service.

🧡3/3

0
0
0